“You will know what happened… And you will know who caused the murders.” | COURT TV

“You will know what happened… And you will know who caused the murders.” | COURT TV

“You will know what happened… And you will know who caused the murders.”

The prosecution and defense gave their opening statements this morning in the trial of #ChadIsaak.

WATCH #CourtTV LIVE court.tv/FindUs

COURT TV IS BACK! 24/7 LIVE gavel-to-gavel coverage, in-depth legal reporting, and expert analysis of the nation’s most important and compelling trials.

WATCH COURT TV LIVE:
https://www.courttv.com/title/court-tv-live-stream-web/?trk=YouTube

WATCH TRIALS ON DEMAND:
https://www.courttv.com/programming/trial-archives/?trk=YouTube

I WANT MY COURT TV:
https://www.courttv.com/where-to-watch/?trk=YouTube

50 Comments

  1. 5:13 I paused it to say how horrible this opening statement it.
    Not 1 time has she mentioned the defendant’s name & what he did wrong.
    Hell, he even looked like – "who tf is she talking about?"
    Not sure how much more I can take from her mundane opening.

  2. Doc thought RJR owned the trailer park company. They didn’t own a trailer house. He wanted Robert and Jackie dead, but killed Mrs Cobb by mistake.

  3. He could be convicted on the contents in his dryer which were very suspect (bent knife and camo mask with orange fibres)… but the police can definitely be criticised for singling him out and not researching other suspects.

  4. This defense attorney is a regular Perry Mason. He is prepared, precise, articulate, he really knows his stuff; good job!!!

  5. Murder is not a rational act. The bullets in the victims were found in the defendant’s home and the gun used in the murder. The clothing on the videos were found in his mobile home as well. He is a chiropractor living 8n a mobile home. Maybe he was just p*ssed because he had to sign a dog contract or maybe he didn’t like the way they cleared the snow that he used to do. Pay attention to the evidence as presented. I’m a former defense attorney after being a federal prosecutor.

  6. THEY SHOULD NOT ASKED THE PYSC,WHY DO SOME PEOPLE KILL AND HE SAID FOR THE THRILL OF IT.TAINTED THE JURY WITH THAT QUESTION.THE WOMEN ON THE JURY MUST HAVE SHYT IN THEIR PANTIES WHEN HE SAID THAT.LMAO

  7. This is going to be a very interesting trial…from the opening statements the state is going to have to go all out to prove there case… with this video in my opinion there has to be a motive my reasoning would be the crime was to horrific the victims attack was so vicious so many wounds , so much blood and 2 different weapons someone would have to have so much hatred for that to happen…in my opinion they may have the wrong man I’ll have to see this trial thru to see if this man did this…

  8. 1:37:30 MItch Kessel. or Kessell – Listen to this .. this is dynamite . And because the cops have picked up poor old C Issac , Kessel has not been questioned. Is he still in town.. has he left the state.??.. I’d be very interested in Mr Kessel (as well as more more obvious suspects ) because the current case is very likely to fall over. ..

  9. I want to hear that his footprints was there in the blood and all over the crime scene. How about his jacket? Was the jacket covered in blood? How about his clothes? The truck with blood all over the pedals? Did he receive cuts from all of the stabbings? The same deputy that he serviced just happen to be near? Any of the victim’s dna found on this person?

  10. i’ve really tried to focus on the opening statement but every time the cam did a close-up from the def’attorney its just bla bla bla what i am hearing. come on you’re in a court room stop being so fkn hot Girl..

  11. When are they going to calculate the height of the suspect in the security video and compare it to the height of the defendant

  12. If you believe in Law Enforcement and that people should be held accountable for the crimes they commit, Please Email your Republican/Democrat Representatives/Senators and let them know that you want to FUND the Police, that you Don’t/Didn’t Want this Infrastruture Bill passed! That you do not want "We The People", or "The Green New Deal" Bills passed, that you want the BORDER CLOSED IMMEDIATELY, that you want VOTER ID. That Nancy Pelosi should be impeached and removed as Speaker of the House. It’s just an Email, Stand up and have YOUR VOICE BE HEARD! Just google IT. If thousands did this, they have to take notice

  13. He doesn’t seem to act like someone who’s been wrongly accused tho unique compared to all other cases. It’s baffling yet if true, it’s amazing and like a hole in one.

  14. The wife set it all up this man has no connection to any of these people I think the wife went to him and that trailer park ask him to murder her husband and those people to make it look like she had nothing to do with it they set it up that way the wife knew that the husband was messing around for 14 years and the wife decided to get rid of him the wife is a old 55 she’s not taking care of herself he saw something else that he likes he’s been having an affair for 14 years so I’m pretty sure that the wife was a sugar mama and she got rid of him you guys listen when somebody stabs you instead of shooting you that’s personal why didn’t he just shoot everybody he shot everybody but the husband he stabbed him so that lets me know that it was personal amen arrest the wife and the wife is still working in that place where her husband died like who would do that what wife would stay in that place

  15. This defense attorney is worth is weight in gold! I saw an hour and a half for this segment said I’ll skip most of it and was riveted to him the entire time score 1 for the underdog with this guy on your side

  16. Opening Statements: Prosecution-10minutes Defense- 1hr 40mins
    Based on critique of Statements, Defense’s pointed out no intent for motive, repeated incompetence of mult agencies re: legally/procedurally, MULT other POI with motive, etc. IMO there will be an acquittal IF these critical strategies are present throughout entire case🤔Definitely impactful Opening Statement

  17. Defense opening is extremely detailed, for certain! The defendant looks perplexed.
    Interesting, though sad for families of deceased. 🙏♥️

  18. This guy is innocent. The jury was intimidated by rjr employees. Ridiculous. Hope the truth comes out one day. It was an inside job and I hope someone comes forward soon.

  19. I’m watching but I’m afraid they may have are arrested the wrong 😑 Guy ….. we shall see 👀. Does anyone have the Defense Attorneys number…if ever I get in trouble I’m hiring him 🤔.

  20. WHOEVER DID THIS HAD TO KNOW WHERE ALL OF THE SECURITY CAMERAS WERE.THEY WERE TOLD WHERE THEY ARE.I THINK THE MANS WIFE HAD SOMEONE DO THE MURDERS AND TOLD WHOEVER SHE GOT TO DO THE KILLINGS,TOLD THE KILLER WHERE THE CAMERAS WERE

  21. It seems he went well prepared, fully dressed, hooded and covered properly to minimise dna evidence being left, wonder if he was inspired from any past cases where such head to toe was covered in clothing, hood, gloves, etc?

  22. I’m so confused…. WHY was/is this man arrested??? Were these so called “detectives” blind or just dumb? Asking for a friend….

  23. I don’t think he did it. There isn’t enough evidence from what I’ve read. He was unlucky to have similar clothes and car. The prosecutor annoys me. She isn’t genuine at all.

  24. The widow has more of a motive wasn’t the over kill. On the woman having an affair with her husband that she threatened too kill? Do I need glasses how The hell can u work out who was walking. And 26 white cars passed that night

  25. It’s the cops! Listen to the dumb fn places evidence was found, in a dryer, who tf would seriously put a knife in the dryer! Ya let’s dry my knife loud af in the dryer, total cop move!

  26. The lawyer at the beginning, the pretty extremely young woman was excellent, she’s new at this, one can tell but, she’s very good at it, she’s a great actress which always makes for a great lawyer, you go girl, you’re going far.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


*